Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for belocenka.by

5 pages crawled — 1882 words, 55 images and 251 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 52 distinct problems found, counted 162 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-27

Category scores

Overall
83/100
SEO
79/100 · Issues: 31
Accessibility
73/100 · Issues: 26
Performance
72/100 · Issues: 24
Security
31/100 · Issues: 44
Privacy
88/100 · Issues: 2
HTML validity
88/100 · Issues: 9
Forms
97/100 · Issues: 5
Links
88/100 · Issues: 6
Console
91/100 · Issues: 5
Infrastructure
100/100 · No issues found
Mobile
94/100 · Issues: 8
Images
99/100 · Issues: 2

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
  • Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
  • Serve every asset over https:// — Browsers stop blocking assets and warning about the padlock.
  • Label every form field — Fields become usable with a screen reader and clickable by their label.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Medium — Performance — 1 of the images sampled are over half a megabyte: /thumb/2/io74FCjO-j6RYBhDB4AsjQ/2000r2000/d/slide-1-min.png (545 KB).
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 1 of 10 checked.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Yandex Metrica with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.