Scan report for axecapoeira.by
5 pages crawled — 1167 words, 26 images and 70 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 48 distinct problems found, counted 102 times across the pages.
Report updated 2026-11-01
Category scores
- Overall
- 87/100
- SEO
- 51/100 · Issues: 36
- Accessibility
- 92/100 · Issues: 6
- Performance
- 85/100 · Issues: 7
- Security
- 39/100 · Issues: 36
- Privacy
- 91/100 · Issues: 1
- HTML validity
- 98/100 · Issues: 1
- Forms
- 99/100 · Issues: 2
- Links
- 94/100 · Issues: 4
- Console
- 96/100 · Issues: 2
- Infrastructure
- 98/100 · Issues: 3
- Mobile
- 98/100 · Issues: 3
- Images
- 99/100 · Issues: 1
Quick Wins
High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.
- Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
- Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
- Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
- Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
- Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.
- Send a Referrer-Policy header — Internal URLs stop leaking to third-party sites.
What the site checks found
- Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
- Medium — SEO — 2 hreflang links are not confirmed by a link back from the other language: / → /ru/ (ru-ru), /2021/08/05/%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%81%d1%82%d0%be%d1%8f%d1%89%d0%b0%d1%8f-%d0%ba%d0%b0%d0%bf%d0%be%d1%8d%d0%b9%d1%80%d0%b0/ → /ru/2021/08/05/%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%8F%D1%89%D0%B0%D1%8F-%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%8D%D0%B9%D1%80%D0%B0/ (ru-ru). Google ignores one-way pairs.
- Low — SEO — 1 alternates are in a different language from the hreflang code they are listed under: / → /ru/ (ru-ru).
- Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
- Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
- Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
- Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
- Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
- Medium — Performance — 1 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
- Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
- Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).
Other sites scanned recently
Scan your own site
Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.