Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for autotime.by

3 pages crawled — 572 words, 62 images and 145 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 58 distinct problems found, counted 125 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-26

Category scores

Overall
74/100
SEO
41/100 · Issues: 20
Accessibility
46/100 · Issues: 24
Performance
85/100 · Issues: 13
Security
0/100 · Issues: 38
Privacy
97/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
94/100 · Issues: 2
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
82/100 · Issues: 8
Console
73/100 · Issues: 9
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
95/100 · Issues: 5
Images
79/100 · Issues: 4

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Stop robots.txt from disallowing the whole site — Search engines are allowed to read the site at all.
  • Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
  • Add alt text to the images that are missing it — Search engines can index the images and screen-reader users learn what they show.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.

What the site checks found

  • Critical — SEO — robots.txt disallows crawling of the home page — search engines are shut out of the site.
  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: server: nginx/1.30.4.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • High — Images — Images that do not load: 5 of 8 checked — the pages show a broken picture where they were.
  • Medium — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 1 of 8 checked.
  • Low — Links — Internal links that reach their page through a redirect: 7 of 8 checked.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.