Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for archsystems.by

4 pages crawled — 758 words, 17 images and 44 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 45 distinct problems found, counted 98 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-31

Category scores

Overall
84/100
SEO
60/100 · Issues: 29
Accessibility
73/100 · Issues: 16
Performance
82/100 · Issues: 7
Security
34/100 · Issues: 33
Privacy
91/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
99/100 · Issues: 1
Forms
100/100 · No issues found
Links
82/100 · Issues: 1
Console
98/100 · Issues: 1
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
93/100 · Issues: 7
Images
99/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Let the viewport be zoomed — Anyone who needs larger text can zoom the page.
  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Medium — Performance — 1 scripts or stylesheets are sent without gzip or Brotli compression.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with zstd but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No SPF record — anyone can send email that claims to come from this domain.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • High — Links — Internal links leading to an error page: 4 of 4 checked.
  • Low — Infrastructure — The domain publishes no MX records, so it cannot receive email.

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.