Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for advokat.by

5 pages crawled — 3209 words, 59 images and 399 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 59 distinct problems found, counted 183 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-10-27

Category scores

Overall
80/100
SEO
55/100 · Issues: 33
Accessibility
52/100 · Issues: 36
Performance
81/100 · Issues: 13
Security
10/100 · Issues: 55
Privacy
85/100 · Issues: 7
HTML validity
91/100 · Issues: 15
Forms
94/100 · Issues: 10
Links
97/100 · Issues: 5
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
97/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
95/100 · Issues: 7
Images
99/100 · Issues: 1

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Write meta descriptions for the pages without one — Google stops inventing snippets and shows the copy you wrote.
  • Update the copyright year — The footer stops telling everyone the site was abandoned.
  • Give every button an accessible name — Every control announces what it does instead of being read out as a button.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Medium — SEO — Both www.advokat.by and the canonical host serve the site with HTTP 200 — the whole site exists at two addresses.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Low — Security — Response headers publish exact software versions: x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.33.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Performance — 1 of 8 static files checked are cached for less than a week, or not at all — returning visitors download them again.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Privacy — The site loads Google Analytics with no consent layer anywhere in the markup — under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive those tags need consent before they run.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.