Skip to main content
SiteScan.top

Scan report for 104.xn--90ais

5 pages crawled — 1695 words, 26 images and 70 links read straight off the pages and checked for accessibility, performance, SEO, security, forms, links and infrastructure. 41 distinct problems found, counted 102 times across the pages.

Report updated 2026-11-01

Category scores

Overall
89/100
SEO
62/100 · Issues: 32
Accessibility
93/100 · Issues: 7
Performance
82/100 · Issues: 22
Security
56/100 · Issues: 32
Privacy
91/100 · Issues: 1
HTML validity
99/100 · Issues: 1
Forms
99/100 · Issues: 2
Links
100/100 · No issues found
Console
100/100 · No issues found
Infrastructure
96/100 · Issues: 1
Mobile
100/100 · No issues found
Images
93/100 · Issues: 4

Quick Wins

High-impact, low-effort fixes, ranked by what this scan actually found.

  • Send a Strict-Transport-Security header — Browsers refuse to fall back to plain HTTP for this domain.
  • Load the first image eagerly — The largest image starts downloading with the page instead of after it.
  • Add an H1 heading — Both readers and crawlers get a clear statement of what the page is about.
  • Set font-display: swap on the web fonts — Text is readable in a fallback face from the first paint instead of being hidden.
  • Send X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff — Browsers stop guessing content types and executing files as scripts.
  • Send an X-Frame-Options header — The site cannot be framed for click-jacking.

What the site checks found

  • Low — SEO — robots.txt has no Sitemap: line — crawlers have to guess where the sitemap is.
  • Medium — SEO — No sitemap.xml found at either the conventional paths or the one robots.txt names.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is sent with no Cache-Control, Expires, ETag or Last-Modified — every visit re-downloads it in full.
  • Low — Performance — The HTML is compressed with gzip but not with Brotli, which every current browser accepts and which is typically 15–20% smaller.
  • Low — Security — No /.well-known/security.txt — anyone who finds a vulnerability has to guess where to report it.
  • Medium — Security — No DMARC record at _dmarc — nothing tells receiving servers what to do with mail that fails the SPF check.
  • Low — Security — No CAA record — any certificate authority may issue a certificate for this domain.
  • Low — Security — The zone is not signed with DNSSEC, so a forged DNS answer cannot be detected.
  • Medium — Privacy — None of the scanned pages links a privacy policy (missing: privacy, terms, imprint).

Other sites scanned recently

Scan your own site

Get the same diagnostic report for your website in under a minute.